<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Andy @ Hillhome.org &#187; Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/tag/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog</link>
	<description>Andrew Hill's Blog.  Politics, technology, all the usual stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 15:49:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Think you&#8217;re entitled to your wealth?</title>
		<link>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2008/11/04/think-youre-entitled-to-your-wealth/</link>
		<comments>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2008/11/04/think-youre-entitled-to-your-wealth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Election 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/?p=166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Think again.  I heard on the radio today the most straightforward and honest explanation I&#8217;ve ever heard from a Liberal Democrat about what they believe.  This is what these people stand for, so watch out, and don&#8217;t be shocked when you end up with less under their rule.  This is Rep. Jim Moran (D-VA):

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think again.  I heard on the radio today the most straightforward and honest explanation I&#8217;ve ever heard from a Liberal Democrat about what they believe.  This is what these people stand for, so watch out, and don&#8217;t be shocked when you end up with less under their rule.  This is <a title="Moran the Redistributer" href="http://moran.house.gov/">Rep. Jim Moran (D-VA)</a>:</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/QJyS1WJNisM&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/QJyS1WJNisM&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;fs=1" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2008/11/04/think-youre-entitled-to-your-wealth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Missourians and Dems, Be Proud</title>
		<link>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2008/10/08/missourians-and-dems-be-proud/</link>
		<comments>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2008/10/08/missourians-and-dems-be-proud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 14:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Election 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/?p=163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Missourians and Democrats should both be proud of Sen. Claire McCaskill&#8217;s behavior toward Mitt Romney.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Missourians and Democrats should both be proud of Sen. Claire McCaskill&#8217;s <a title="McCaskill" href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1008/McCaskills_edge.html">behavior toward Mitt Romney</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2008/10/08/missourians-and-dems-be-proud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s Illogical Tax Policy</title>
		<link>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2008/09/08/obamas-illogical-tax-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2008/09/08/obamas-illogical-tax-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 23:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Election 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/?p=162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This one I just don&#8217;t get.  Barack Obama said today that he might not rescind President Bush&#8217;s tax cuts in light of the current economic slowdown.
That implies that he thinks it would be harmful to the economy to raise taxes on &#8220;the wealthy few.&#8221;  If it&#8217;s a bad idea in an economic downturn, how is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one I just don&#8217;t get.  Barack Obama said today that <a title="Obama Logic" href="http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/09/07/obama-recession-could-delay-end-to-bush-tax-cuts/">he might not rescind President Bush&#8217;s tax cuts</a> in light of the current economic slowdown.</p>
<p>That implies that he thinks it would be harmful to the economy to raise taxes on &#8220;the wealthy few.&#8221;  If it&#8217;s a bad idea in an economic downturn, how is it a good idea any other time?  Someone needs to have a talk with the Messiah about logic and contradiction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2008/09/08/obamas-illogical-tax-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palin Rumors, Ratings, Pivots</title>
		<link>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2008/09/06/palin-rumors-ratings-pivots/</link>
		<comments>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2008/09/06/palin-rumors-ratings-pivots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 16:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Election 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/?p=160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just came across a site that painstakingly addresses all the rumors circulating about Gov. Sarah Palin.  Most of them are beyond absurd.
I&#8217;m sure it pained the Huffington Post to run this story about McCain&#8217;s speech not only topping Palin&#8217;s in the ratings, but also the messianic Obama&#8217;s speech, and every other convention speech in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just came across a site that painstakingly addresses all the <a title="Palin Rumors" href="http://explorations.chasrmartin.com/2008/09/06/palin-rumors/">rumors circulating about Gov. Sarah Palin</a>.  Most of them are beyond absurd.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure it pained the Huffington Post to run <a title="McCain Ratings" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/05/republican-national-conve_n_124305.html">this story</a> about McCain&#8217;s speech not only topping Palin&#8217;s in the ratings, but also the messianic Obama&#8217;s speech, and every other convention speech in history.  Obama may be largely responsible for the surge in interest this election cycle, but that does not mean he&#8217;ll reap all the benefits.</p>
<p>Finally, Michael Barone does a good job of <a title="Barone on RNC" href="http://www.usnews.com/blogs/barone/2008/9/5/6-ways-mccain-can-run-as-the-candidate-of-the-party-of-an-unpopular-president.html">summing up the events and results</a> of the last week at the GOP convention.  Now we&#8217;ll have to see how successfully McCain/Palin can execute on the pivot they made towards being maverick reformers, instead of focusing on &#8220;experience.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2008/09/06/palin-rumors-ratings-pivots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Governor Palin</title>
		<link>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2008/08/30/governor-palin/</link>
		<comments>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2008/08/30/governor-palin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 14:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Election 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biden]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/?p=159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This pick looks promising &#8211; I&#8217;m still reading up on her.
In the meantime, my favorite line from National Review Online this morning about Joe Biden:
Real people don&#8217;t define &#8220;experience&#8221; as appearing on unwatched Sunday-morning talk shows every week for 35 years and having been around long enough to have got both the War on Terror [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This pick looks promising &#8211; I&#8217;m still reading up on her.</p>
<p>In the meantime, my favorite line from <a title="NRO" href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/">National Review Online</a> this morning about Joe Biden:</p>
<blockquote><p>Real people don&#8217;t define &#8220;experience&#8221; as appearing on unwatched Sunday-morning talk shows every week for 35 years and having been around long enough to have got both the War on Terror and the Cold War wrong.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2008/08/30/governor-palin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More on Obama and Biden</title>
		<link>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2008/08/23/more-on-obama-and-biden/</link>
		<comments>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2008/08/23/more-on-obama-and-biden/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 15:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buffett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/?p=158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some articles I found that mirror my own thoughts:
Jim Geraghty on Joe Biden vs. Barack Obama on National Review Online
Michael Barone on the unsustainable nature of Obama&#8217;s Narrative on National Review Online
Best line from the Weekly Standard Blog: &#8220;We&#8217;ll get to dust off Joe Biden&#8217;s greatest hits, a pleasurable task that will take weeks.&#8221;
I love [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some articles I found that mirror my own thoughts:</p>
<p><a title="Geraghty on NRO" href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NGRhNzJlMWY5NjdiNzhjMTRkYjMzNjYwOGJmYzNjMTY=">Jim Geraghty on Joe Biden vs. Barack Obama on National Review Online</a></p>
<p><a title="Barone on NRO" href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MmYwMzcxODllNmNiY2FlNjg4N2I4ZGFkMzAxNDNlNTY=">Michael Barone on the unsustainable nature of Obama&#8217;s Narrative on National Review Online</a></p>
<p>Best line from the <a title="Weekly Standard" href="http://weeklystandard.com/Weblogs/TWSFP/TWSFPView.asp#8201">Weekly Standard Blog</a>: &#8220;We&#8217;ll get to dust off Joe Biden&#8217;s greatest hits, a pleasurable task that will take weeks.&#8221;</p>
<p>I love Warren Buffett, but his politics just don&#8217;t match up with the pure capitalism that is Berkshire Hathaway.  This quote from a <a title="NYT on Obama" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/24/magazine/24Obamanomics-t.html?_r=2&amp;hp=&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;adxnnlx=1219503725-eyOu8ezxbu9FsyPJ8uXV6w">New York Times Magazine article</a> sums up what Obama would do to us:</p>
<blockquote><p>“If you talk to Warren, he’ll tell you his preference is not to meddle in the economy at all — let the market work, however way it’s going to work, and then just tax the heck out of people at the end and just redistribute it,” Obama said. “That way you’re not impeding efficiency, and you’re achieving equity on the back end.” He continued by saying that he thought there was some merit in Buffett’s argument.</p></blockquote>
<p>And of course, the Messiah video is just great:<br />
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PetxaA42OuE&amp;color1=11645361&amp;color2=13619151&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PetxaA42OuE&amp;color1=11645361&amp;color2=13619151&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="transparent"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2008/08/23/more-on-obama-and-biden/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Joe Biden as VP</title>
		<link>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2008/08/23/joe-biden-as-vp/</link>
		<comments>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2008/08/23/joe-biden-as-vp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 14:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Election 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biden]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/?p=157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joe Biden is actually the pick I was hoping for.Â  He is actually quite a funny guy, but he often takes it too far.  It&#8217;s only a matter of time before he puts his foot in his mouth again, or perhaps even his entire leg.
The idea that 6 terms in the U.S. Senate make him [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Biden Wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biden">Joe Biden</a> is actually the pick I was hoping for.Â  He is actually quite a funny guy, but he often takes it too far.  It&#8217;s only a matter of time before he puts his foot in his mouth again, or perhaps even his entire leg.</p>
<p>The idea that 6 terms in the U.S. Senate make him a &#8220;foreign policy expert&#8221; is really amusing to me.  There&#8217;s a big difference between chairing a committee on foreign policy, and being the policy maker and executor of America&#8217;s foreign policy.</p>
<p>This goes back to the fact that Senators do not make good presidents.  But then again, that&#8217;s just my opinion &#8211; I could be wrong.  And yes, I realize that McCain is in the same boat.</p>
<p>My favorite Biden quote (of this presidential campaign) had to do with Rudy Giuliani:</p>
<blockquote><p>There&#8217;s only three things he mentions in a sentence: a noun, and a verb and 9/11.</p></blockquote>
<p>Here it is on YouTube:</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/mPOAKXBi9Pw&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/mPOAKXBi9Pw&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2008/08/23/joe-biden-as-vp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snapshot of Past Climate Reveals No Ice in Antarctica Millions of Years Ago</title>
		<link>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2008/07/29/snapshot-of-past-climate-reveals-no-ice-in-antarctica-millions-of-years-ago/</link>
		<comments>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2008/07/29/snapshot-of-past-climate-reveals-no-ice-in-antarctica-millions-of-years-ago/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/?p=156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Picked this up from the NASA Earth Observatory site.  I can&#8217;t wait to see how the Al Gore fanboy croud reacts to this one:
EO News: Snapshot of Past Climate Reveals No Ice in Antarctica Millions of Years Ago &#8211; July 28, 2008
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Picked this up from the NASA Earth Observatory site.  I can&#8217;t wait to see how the Al Gore fanboy croud reacts to this one:</p>
<p><a href="http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Newsroom/MediaAlerts/2008/2008072827309.html">EO News: Snapshot of Past Climate Reveals No Ice in Antarctica Millions of Years Ago &#8211; July 28, 2008</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2008/07/29/snapshot-of-past-climate-reveals-no-ice-in-antarctica-millions-of-years-ago/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats and Our Enemies</title>
		<link>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2008/05/21/democrats-and-our-enemies/</link>
		<comments>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2008/05/21/democrats-and-our-enemies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 17:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Election 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2008/05/21/democrats-and-our-enemies/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sen. Joseph Lieberman makes far too much sense in an opinion pieceÂ in today&#8217;s Wall Street Journal.Â  Meanwhile, the kook lefties at Daily Kos react predictably, using lines like &#8220;true diplomacy comes from using the velvet glove.&#8221;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Joseph Lieberman makes far too much sense in an <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121132806884008847.html?mod=opinion_main_commentaries">opinion piece</a>Â in today&#8217;s Wall Street Journal.Â  Meanwhile, the kook lefties at Daily Kos <a title="Kooks" href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/5/21/123227/039/4/519685">react predictably</a>, using lines like &#8220;true diplomacy comes from using the velvet glove.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2008/05/21/democrats-and-our-enemies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Finally, Straight Talk from a Politician</title>
		<link>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2007/05/23/finally-straight-talk-from-a-politician/</link>
		<comments>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2007/05/23/finally-straight-talk-from-a-politician/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 16:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2007/05/23/finally-straight-talk-from-a-politician/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is priceless: John Boehner calls Immigration Bill a &#8220;Piece Of Shit&#8221;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is priceless: <a href="http://hotlineblog.nationaljournal.com/archives/2007/05/post_211.html">John Boehner calls Immigration Bill a &#8220;Piece Of Shit&#8221;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2007/05/23/finally-straight-talk-from-a-politician/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Immigration Deal Scorecard</title>
		<link>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2007/05/18/immigration-deal-scorecard/</link>
		<comments>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2007/05/18/immigration-deal-scorecard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 22:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Election 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2007/05/18/immigration-deal-scorecard/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Personally, this new deal looks like a terrible idea. What I&#8217;ve found particularly interesting is the interesting mix of people from both parties that also don&#8217;t like it. As you would expect, most Republican presidential candidates are against the deal, even though President Bush is ostensibly for it. It shocks me a little that many [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, <a title="Deal" href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,273192,00.html" target="_blank">this new deal</a> looks like a terrible idea. What I&#8217;ve found particularly interesting is the interesting mix of people from both parties that also don&#8217;t like it. As you would expect, most Republican presidential candidates are against the deal, even though President Bush is ostensibly for it. It shocks me a little that many Democrats are coming out against it, although most are not using very strong language.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a rundown.  You can click the position of each person for the supporting press release or article that I drew the conclusion from.</p>
<table style="height: 204px;" border="1" width="432">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td rowspan="6" align="left"><strong>Republicans</strong></td>
<td><strong>Candidate/Person</strong></td>
<td><strong>Position</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><a title="McCain" href="http://johnmccain.com" target="_blank">John McCain</a></td>
<td valign="top"><a title="Gingrich" href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/bloomberg/20070517/pl_bloomberg/admrmxcaepv8_1" target="_blank"><span style="color: #008000;">For</span></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><a title="Rudy" href="http://www.joinrudy2008.com/news/pr/222" target="_blank">Rudy Giuliani</a></td>
<td valign="top"><a title="Rudy" href="http://www.joinrudy2008.com/news/pr/222" target="_blank">Unknown</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><a title="Mitt" href="http://www.mittromney.com/" target="_blank">Mitt Romney</a></td>
<td valign="top"><a title="Romney Position" href="http://www.mittromney.com/News/Press-Releases/Governor_Mitt_Romney_On_The_Senate_Immigration_Agreement" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000;">Strongly Against</span></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><a title="Newt" href="http://www.newt.org/" target="_blank">Newt Gingrich</a></td>
<td valign="top"><a title="Gingrich position" href="http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=11458" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000;">Strongly Against</span></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><a title="Tom Tancredo" href="http://www.teamtancredo.com/" target="_blank">Tom Tancredo</a></td>
<td valign="top"><a title="Tancredo position" href="http://www.myfoxcolorado.com/myfox/pages/News/Detail?contentId=3238140&amp;version=2&amp;locale=EN-US&amp;layoutCode=TSTY&amp;pageId=3.2.1" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000;">Strongly Against</span></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="7" align="left"><strong>Democrats</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><a title="Pelosi" href="http://www.house.gov/pelosi/" target="_blank">Nancy Pelosi</a></td>
<td valign="top"><a title="Pelosi" href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=070517220656.d4w2ywk1&amp;show_article=1" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ffa500;">Reservations</span></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><a title="Reid" href="http://reid.senate.gov/" target="_blank">Harry Reid</a></td>
<td valign="top"><a title="Reid" href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=070517220656.d4w2ywk1&amp;show_article=1" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ffa500;">Reservations</span></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><a title="Obama" href="http://www.barackobama.com/" target="_blank">Barack Obama</a></td>
<td valign="top"><a title="Obama" href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/TheNote/story?id=3105455&amp;page=1" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000;">Against in current form</span></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><a title="Hillary" href="http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/release/view/?id=1709" target="_blank">Hillary Clinton</a></td>
<td valign="top"><a title="Hillary" href="http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/release/view/?id=1709" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ffa500;">Hedging</span></a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The folks over at <a title="betterimmigration" href="http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez2008.html" target="_blank">betterimmigration.com</a> have a lot of information on where the candidates stand, as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2007/05/18/immigration-deal-scorecard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Perspective</title>
		<link>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2005/09/23/perspective/</link>
		<comments>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2005/09/23/perspective/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2005 16:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/?p=62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been thinking a lot about all the money we&#8217;re about to spend on reconstruction of New Orleans, and other areas.  With Rita bearing down on Texas, and already causing at least one NO levee to break again, it seems that we may not even be close to knowing the full extent of this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been thinking a lot about all the money we&#8217;re about to spend on reconstruction of New Orleans, and other areas.  With Rita bearing down on Texas, and already causing at least one NO levee to <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,170213,00.html">break again</a>, it seems that we may not even be close to knowing the full extent of this year&#8217;s devastation.</p>
<p>I have read a lot of different opinions out there, including those who say that we should remember the old days, when the federal government would not have assisted in any significant way.  I first received <a href="http://www.wmi.org/multi_boards/Politics/T12449.htm">this opinion</a> via e-mail, but then found it online as well.  The facts are questionable, as I couldn&#8217;t find evidence of any hurricane in 1927 in my cursory search.  However, the underlying sentiment is a reflection of a broader opinion by many people that we should not simply dole out federal money in the form of blank checks to blindly rebuild the city.  Some of the more conservative Republicans in congress are not entirely on-board with the President&#8217;s plans, either.</p>
<p>National Review&#8217;s John Tamny writes an <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/nrof_comment/tamny200509140845.asp">interesting column</a>, talking about the flood of 1927 that hit New Orleans (probably the disaster that the writer above mistook for a hurricane).  In short, we need to take care that we are not spending money for political expediency, something that both Democrats and Republicans seem all to willing to do, trying to prove that their respective party is more sympathetic to the plight of gulf coast residents than the other.  Nothing the federal government has done in the entire history of this country suggests that it is the best entity to re-construct an entire region.  It will obviously have to be involved, but the less so, the better for all of us &#8211; especially the residents of that area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2005/09/23/perspective/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Denouement</title>
		<link>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2005/02/02/denouement/</link>
		<comments>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2005/02/02/denouement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2005 21:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
There&#8217;s just not much to say now that the insanity of the 2004 election year is long-since over&#8230;
I guess I&#8217;ll have to find something interesting to devote my attention to, as a replacement for all the energy I was spending on politics&#8230;

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="clear:both;"></div>
<p>There&#8217;s just not much to say now that the insanity of the 2004 election year is long-since over&#8230;</p>
<p>I guess I&#8217;ll have to find something interesting to devote my attention to, as a replacement for all the energy I was spending on politics&#8230;</p>
<div style="clear:both; padding-bottom: 0.25em;"></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2005/02/02/denouement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Latest polls and electoral math</title>
		<link>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2004/10/29/latest-polls-and-electoral-math/</link>
		<comments>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2004/10/29/latest-polls-and-electoral-math/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Lookin&#8217; pretty good.
Also:

Bush clearly has the upper-hand.  If he can take Florida and Ohio, or several other combinations, he&#8217;ll get over the 270 electoral vote threshold and win the election.  Kerry is on defense.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="clear:both;"></div>
<p><img width="90%" src="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/news_images-on_site/3waybig.jpg"></p>
<p>Lookin&#8217; pretty good.</p>
<p>Also:</p>
<p><img width="90%" src="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/images/rcp%20electoral/RCP-10-28-REV3.gif"></p>
<p>Bush clearly has the upper-hand.  If he can take Florida and Ohio, or several other combinations, he&#8217;ll get over the 270 electoral vote threshold and win the election.  Kerry is on defense.</p>
<div style="clear:both; padding-bottom: 0.25em;"></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2004/10/29/latest-polls-and-electoral-math/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WorldNetDaily: Discovered papers: Hanoi directed Kerry</title>
		<link>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2004/10/26/worldnetdaily-discovered-papers-hanoi-directed-kerry/</link>
		<comments>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2004/10/26/worldnetdaily-discovered-papers-hanoi-directed-kerry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
WorldNetDaily: Discovered papers: Hanoi directed Kerry
Who knows if this is true, but it certainly would not be surprising!
Thankfully, the electoral math seems to be stacking up against Kerry at this point.  The best site I&#8217;ve found for keeping track of polls is RealClearPolitics.
Specifically, The electoral count update.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="clear:both;"></div>
<p><a href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=41106">WorldNetDaily: Discovered papers: Hanoi directed Kerry</a></p>
<p>Who knows if this is true, but it certainly would not be surprising!</p>
<p>Thankfully, the electoral math seems to be stacking up against Kerry at this point.  The best site I&#8217;ve found for keeping track of polls is <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com">RealClearPolitics</a>.</p>
<p>Specifically, <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/Presidential_04/RCP_EC.html">The electoral count update</a>.</p>
<div style="clear:both; padding-bottom: 0.25em;"></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2004/10/26/worldnetdaily-discovered-papers-hanoi-directed-kerry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bush, Dems Make Deal on Nominees</title>
		<link>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2004/05/19/bush-dems-make-deal-on-nominees/</link>
		<comments>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2004/05/19/bush-dems-make-deal-on-nominees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2004 21:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FOXNews.com &#8211; Politics &#8211; Bush, Dems Make Deal on Nominees
This drives me nuts.  How nice of Tom Daschle and his cronies to finally allow a vote to take place.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,120269,00.html">FOXNews.com &#8211; Politics &#8211; Bush, Dems Make Deal on Nominees</a></p>
<p>This drives me nuts.  How nice of Tom Daschle and his cronies to finally allow a vote to take place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://andy.hillhome.org/blog/2004/05/19/bush-dems-make-deal-on-nominees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
